McGill University · MATH 141

McGill MATH 141: Calculus 2 tutoring

Work with an online tutor on integration methods, applications and introductory series in McGill MATH 141. You can start with an integral you have not been able to begin. Your tutor can help you choose a method, check an antiderivative by differentiating and use a sketch to explain the bounds.

Listed course

Course overview

McGill MATH 141 covers definite integrals, integration techniques and applications, and an introduction to sequences and series.

Practise the reasoning between steps

Choose a workshop when the topic is included in your instructor’s announced material. These original exercises are not an exam reproduction or a complete course review.

If these techniques are in your announced chapters: compare identities and trigonometric substitution in the shared workshop. Then choose a course question and verify your antiderivative by differentiating.

MATH 141 topics to review

Definite integralsFundamental theorem of calculusIntegration techniquesApplications of integrationSequencesIntroductory series

Common difficulties

  • Recognizing substitution or integration-by-parts structure
  • Interpreting bounds, signs and convergence arguments

MATH 141: choose the method and build the integral

Choose a method for a definite integral, then set up an area between curves. Explain your method and bounds before calculating.

Add sequences and series if they are on your review list.

Before you start: Allow 20 minutes for both questions, then 10 minutes to check your work and explain your choices aloud.

1. Choose parts when substitution does not remove a factor

Evaluate I=∫0ln⁡2xex dxI=\int_0^{\ln2}xe^x\,dx. Explain your method and give an exact answer.

Show the explained solution
  1. Integration by parts shortens the polynomial: choose u=xu=x and dv=ex dxdv=e^x\,dx, so du=dxdu=dx and v=exv=e^x.
  2. I=[xex]0ln⁡2−∫0ln⁡2ex dx.I=[xe^x]_0^{\ln2}-\int_0^{\ln2}e^x\,dx. The boundary term is 2ln⁡22\ln2, and the remaining integral is 2−1=12-1=1. Therefore I=2ln⁡2−1I=2\ln2-1.
  3. The antiderivative (x−1)ex(x-1)e^x differentiates to xexxe^x. Also I≈0.3863>0I\approx0.3863>0, as expected from the nonnegative integrand and increasing bounds.
  4. A substitution such as the exponent itself only renames the variable here. The useful change is to reduce the polynomial factor by differentiation.

Compare substitution and integration by parts

2. Let the curves determine the bounds and sign

Find the area enclosed by y=3x−x2y=3x-x^2 and y=xy=x. Coordinates are dimensionless. Set up the integral before evaluating it.

Show the explained solution
  1. Intersections satisfy 3x−x2=x3x-x^2=x, so x(2−x)=0x(2-x)=0, giving x=0,2x=0,2.
  2. Between those values, (3x−x2)−x=x(2−x)≥0(3x-x^2)-x=x(2-x)\ge0; the parabola is above the line. Thus A=∫02(2x−x2) dx.A=\int_0^2(2x-x^2)\,dx.
  3. A=[x2−x33]02=43.A=\left[x^2-\frac{x^3}{3}\right]_0^2=\frac43. This is a positive area in square coordinate units.
  4. If you reverse the top and bottom functions, the integral becomes negative. If you insert arbitrary bounds, it no longer describes the enclosed region.

Practise integral applications and setup

Use your answers to plan your revision
  1. If question 1 stalled

    Compare substitution and parts in the linked integration-methods lesson. Then use the worked example on this page that combines both methods, keeping its transformed bounds beside the new variable.

  2. If question 2 had the wrong sign or bounds

    Sketch the two curves and mark each intersection. Use a test input between consecutive intersections before deciding which function goes on top.

  3. If series are on your current outline

    Use the sequences-and-series practice on this page after the integral review. Distinguish the limit of a sequence from the sum of a series, and write the assumptions for the convergence argument you choose.

Bring the integral you could not set up or the line where your method stopped helping. A focused lesson can compare two possible first moves and give you a fresh problem to solve without the earlier solution.

Request MATH 141 exam preparation help

Original Nablio practice, not an official examination.

Course topic sources

Preparing for this course

Review derivative rules, basic antiderivatives and algebra. Distinguish a signed accumulation from geometric area before choosing integration bounds.

Registration requirements

The guidance above is study preparation, not an eligibility decision. Confirm current prerequisites, restrictions and availability with McGill University.

Check the official course catalogue

Try a course problem

Let xx be the integration variable. Evaluate ∫023x2 dx\int_0^2 3x^2\,dx.

Show the reasoning

An antiderivative is F(x)=x3F(x)=x^3, because F′(x)=3x2F^\prime(x)=3x^2. The fundamental theorem of calculus gives the upper-end value minus the lower-end value: F(2)−F(0)=23−03=8F(2)-F(0)=2^3-0^3=8. A constant of integration would cancel in this difference.

A definite integral that needs two decisions

A useful substitution can simplify an integral without finishing it. This exercise applies two methods in sequence and keeps the bounds consistent throughout.

1. Identify the inside function and its derivative

Let xx be the real integration variable and II the value of the definite integral below. The symbol ln⁡\ln denotes the natural logarithm. Evaluate I=∫01xln⁡(1+x2) dx.I=\int_0^1 x\ln(1+x^2)\,dx. The derivative of 1+x21+x^2 is 2x2x, so the outside factor x dxx\,dx is half the needed differential. This makes u=1+x2u=1+x^2 a useful first move.

2. Change the differential and both bounds

Since du=2x dxdu=2x\,dx, we have x dx=12dux\,dx=\tfrac12du. The lower bound x=0x=0 becomes u=1u=1, and x=1x=1 becomes u=2u=2. Thus I=12∫12ln⁡u du.I=\frac12\int_1^2\ln u\,du. Every part now uses the same variable.

3. Use integration by parts on the simpler integral

Write ln⁡u\ln u as ln⁡u⋅1\ln u\cdot1. Differentiating the logarithm and integrating 11 gives ∫ln⁡u du=uln⁡u−∫u1u du=uln⁡u−u+C.\begin{gathered}\int\ln u\,du\\=u\ln u-\int u\frac1u\,du\\=u\ln u-u+C.\end{gathered} This works because the remaining product simplifies to 11. The method follows the product rule in reverse. Here CC is an arbitrary constant of integration. It cancels when the antiderivative is evaluated at the two bounds.

4. Evaluate and check the scale

Using the new bounds, I=12[(2ln⁡2−2)−(1ln⁡1−1)]=ln⁡2−12≈0.1931.\begin{gathered}I\\=\frac12[(2\ln2-2)-(1\ln1-1)]\\=\ln2-\frac12\\\approx0.1931.\end{gathered} To check the scale, 0≤x≤10\le x\le1 gives 1≤1+x2≤21\le1+x^2\le2. Since the logarithm is increasing, 0≤ln⁡(1+x2)≤ln⁡20\le\ln(1+x^2)\le\ln2. Multiplying by nonnegative xx and integrating gives 0≤I≤∫01xln⁡2 dx=ln⁡22≈0.3466.\begin{gathered}0\le I\le\int_0^1x\ln2\,dx\\=\frac{\ln2}{2}\\\approx0.3466.\end{gathered} Our result lies within this range. As a separate check of the antiderivative, differentiating 12[(1+x2)ln⁡(1+x2)−(1+x2)]\tfrac12[(1+x^2)\ln(1+x^2)-(1+x^2)] recovers xln⁡(1+x2)x\ln(1+x^2).

Try it yourself

Use the same reasoning to evaluate J=∫01xln⁡(1+2x2) dx.J=\int_0^1x\ln(1+2x^2)\,dx. State the new differential and bounds before integrating.

Show the explained solution

With u=1+2x2u=1+2x^2, du=4x dxdu=4x\,dx, and bounds 1,31,3: J=14∫13ln⁡u du=3ln⁡3−24≈0.3240.\begin{gathered}J=\frac14\int_1^3\ln u\,du\\=\frac{3\ln3-2}{4}\\\approx0.3240.\end{gathered} The changed factor and upper bound both matter.

Before each calculation, give a reason for the next move. If the first substitution leaves a new integral, inspect that new structure instead of forcing the original method again.

Original practice

A sequence term and a series sum answer different questions

Let an=3(1/2)n−1a_n=3(1/2)^{n-1} for integers n≥1n\ge1. Find the limit of the sequence (an)(a_n), then find the sum of the series ∑n=1∞an\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}a_n. These are different questions.

Show the reasoning

The terms begin 3,  3/2,  3/4,  3/8,…3,\;3/2,\;3/4,\;3/8,\ldots. Each is half the previous term, so an→0a_n\to0.

To study the series, define its NN-term partial sum:SN=3+32+⋯+32N−1.\begin{aligned}S_N&=3+\frac32+\cdots\\&\quad+\frac3{2^{N-1}}.\end{aligned}Subtracting half this sum cancels the middle terms:SN−12SN=3−32N.S_N-\frac12S_N=3-\frac3{2^N}.Therefore SN=6(1−2−N)S_N=6(1-2^{-N}). Since 2−N→02^{-N}\to0, the partial sums approach 6. The sequence approaches zero, while the series sums to six.

After four terms, S4=45/8=5.625S_4=45/8=5.625. The remaining infinite tail is 6−S4=3/8=0.3756-S_4=3/8=0.375.

Avoid this mistake: A term approaching zero does not, by itself, prove that a series converges. Here convergence follows from the partial-sum formula.

Try it

For bn=2(1/3)n−1b_n=2(1/3)^{n-1}, find the term limit and series sum.

Check your reasoning

The term limit is 00; the sum is 2/(1−1/3)=32/(1-1/3)=3, because the geometric ratio has absolute value below one.

Why terms tending to zero are not enough

The harmonic series is ∑n=1∞1/n\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}1/n. Its terms tend to zero. Does the series converge?

See why the series diverges

No. Let HN=∑n=1N1/nH_N=\sum_{n=1}^{N}1/n. Convergence would require these partial sums to approach a finite number. Group the terms after the first one into blocks: 1/21/2, then 1/3+1/41/3+1/4, then 1/5+⋯+1/81/5+\cdots+1/8, and so on.

For every integer k≥1k\ge1, the block from n=2k−1+1n=2^{k-1}+1 to n=2kn=2^k has 2k−12^{k-1} terms. Each term is at least 1/2k1/2^k, so each block contributes at least 1/21/2. After mm blocks, for every integer m≥1m\ge1,H2m≥1+m2.H_{2^m}\ge1+\frac{m}{2}.

The bound grows without limit as mm increases, so the partial sums are unbounded. The harmonic series diverges even though 1/n→01/n\to0. The argument works for arbitrarily many blocks; checking a few partial sums alone would not prove divergence.

If your current MATH 141 outline includes comparison, ratio and alternating-series tests, continue with the series-convergence test practice. Otherwise, stay with term limits and partial sums, and check your instructor’s current outline before moving to those tests.

How tutoring can help

You can start with an integral you do not know how to approach. Your tutor can explain how to choose a method, work through a change of variable and bounds with you, and show how differentiation checks an antiderivative. For sequences and series, you can first clarify the difference between a term and a partial sum, then work through the reasoning about convergence. Your current course material guides the examples; you can try a similar question with help before working independently.

Exam preparation for MATH 141

Mix methods with geometric applications and the sequence/series material in your outline. Explain why a convergence test applies rather than naming one without conditions.

Use your section’s outline to choose the chapters to review. We work through permitted practice and comparable problems, without completing graded assignments or exams on your behalf.

Need help with MATH 141?

Send your topic and preferred times. We’ll confirm whether we can help and, if so, agree on a time by text or email before payment.

Request MATH 141 tutoring

Nablio is an independent service and is not affiliated with this institution.

MATH 141 · official course referenceMATH 141 · official offering information