Independent study guide

Improper Integrals: Define the Limit, Decide Convergence

Learn improper integrals through one-sided limits, endpoint singularities, power tests and comparison. Worked examples, an area diagram and four progressive questions explain convergence and the principal-value trap.

Nablio · 35 minPublished

Stuck on a step? Text us Email us Request a lesson

For course topics and one-to-one help, see Concordia MATH 205 tutoring.

An integral can have an infinite interval and still give a finite answer. It can also have finite bounds and fail to exist. The deciding question is whether the relevant limits of ordinary definite integrals exist as finite real numbers.

This lesson builds the definition before using shortcuts. You will learn to locate every improper point, set up separate one-sided limits, use power functions and comparisons, and explain a conclusion. Be comfortable with basic antiderivatives and one-sided limits; the integration-methods guide can help with the calculations.

All examples and practice are original Nablio teaching material. Improper integrals are listed in the current description of Concordia MATH 205. This independent guide does not establish any particular section’s assessment coverage; use your instructor’s current outline.

1. What makes an integral improper?

The definite integral of a continuous function on a closed, bounded interval is ordinary, or proper. Two situations require a limiting definition here:

  • An infinite bound: the interval continues without end.
  • An unbounded integrand: near an endpoint or an interior point, the function being integrated can take values as large in absolute value as you like. Such a point is called a singularity here.

A missing value by itself does not force divergence. For example, a removable hole can be filled without changing an integral. A bounded jump can also be integrable in the ordinary sense. First inspect the domain and the behaviour near each excluded point.

For a right-infinite interval, assume that ff is continuous on every finite interval [a,R][a,R]. The definition is

∫a∞f(x) dx=lim⁡R→∞∫aRf(x) dx.\begin{aligned}&\int_a^\infty f(x)\,dx\\&\quad=\lim_{R\to\infty}\int_a^R f(x)\,dx.\end{aligned}

The symbol ∞\infty is not a number to substitute into an antiderivative. Evaluate the definite integral for finite RR, then take a limit. For a left-infinite interval, use a separate finite lower bound:

∫−∞bf(x) dx=lim⁡L→−∞∫Lbf(x) dx.\begin{aligned}&\int_{-\infty}^b f(x)\,dx\\&\quad=\lim_{L\to-\infty}\int_L^b f(x)\,dx.\end{aligned}

The improper integral converges if its defining limit is a finite real number. It diverges otherwise. A limit of +∞+\infty or −∞-\infty is divergence, and a limit that fails to exist because of oscillation is also divergence. For instance, the truncated integral ∫0Rcos⁡x dx\int_0^R\cos x\,dx equals sin⁡R\sin R, which has no limit as R→∞R\to\infty.

2. An infinite interval, a finite limit

Worked example: how much area remains?

Determine whether ∫1∞x−2 dx\int_1^\infty x^{-2}\,dx converges. For R>1R>1, define the accumulated area A(R)A(R):

A(R)=∫1Rx−2 dx=[−1x]1R=1−1R.\begin{aligned}A(R)&=\int_1^R x^{-2}\,dx\\&=\left[-\frac1x\right]_1^R\\&=1-\frac1R.\end{aligned}

Now take the limit:

lim⁡R→∞A(R)=1.\lim_{R\to\infty}A(R)=1.

Thus the improper integral converges to 11. The curve stays positive forever, but the additional area becomes small enough for the total to approach a finite value.

The curve y equals one over x squared for x at least one. Teal shading runs from x equals one to the cutoff R equals two. Amber shading is the beginning of the remaining tail to the right of R. The tail continues beyond the displayed window.
At the illustrated cutoff R=2R=2, the accumulated area is 1/21/2, and the entire remaining tail also has area 1/21/2. The amber region continues beyond the picture; the finite plotted window does not contain the whole tail.

More generally, the tail after RR is

∫R∞x−2 dx=1R.\int_R^\infty x^{-2}\,dx=\frac1R.

To make the omitted area at most 0.010.01, choose R≥100R\ge100. This is an exact error bound for this particular example, not a general rule for all improper integrals.

Approaching zero is not enough

Compare with a slower-decaying function:

∫1Rdxx=ln⁡R.\int_1^R\frac{dx}{x}=\ln R.

Although 1/x→01/x\to0, the accumulated area grows without bound. Therefore ∫1∞dx/x\int_1^\infty dx/x diverges. A small function value far out on the axis does not by itself control the total area over an infinite interval.

3. An unbounded integrand near an endpoint

Suppose ff is continuous on (a,b](a,b] and unbounded as x→a+x\to a^+. Approach the endpoint from inside the interval:

∫abf(x) dx=lim⁡t→a+∫tbf(x) dx.\begin{aligned}&\int_a^b f(x)\,dx\\&\quad=\lim_{t\to a^+}\int_t^b f(x)\,dx.\end{aligned}

For a singularity at the right endpoint instead, use

∫abf(x) dx=lim⁡t→b−∫atf(x) dx.\begin{aligned}&\int_a^b f(x)\,dx\\&\quad=\lim_{t\to b^-}\int_a^t f(x)\,dx.\end{aligned}

These formulas apply to one problematic endpoint at a time. If both endpoints are problematic, split at an ordinary interior point and test the two pieces separately.

Worked example: a vertical asymptote with finite area

For ∫04dx/x\int_0^4 dx/\sqrt{x}, the interval is finite, but the integrand is unbounded near 00. For 0<t<40<t<4,

∫t4x−1/2 dx=[2x]t4=4−2t.\begin{aligned}\int_t^4 x^{-1/2}\,dx&=\left[2\sqrt{x}\right]_t^4\\&=4-2\sqrt{t}.\end{aligned}

As t→0+t\to0^+, this tends to 44. The integral converges. The unbounded height alone does not determine the result; we must examine the limiting accumulated area.

Replacing the integrand by 1/x1/x changes the outcome:

∫t4dxx=ln⁡4−ln⁡t.\int_t^4\frac{dx}{x}=\ln4-\ln t.

Since ln⁡t→−∞\ln t\to-\infty as t→0+t\to0^+, the integral diverges to +∞+\infty.

4. Split at every interior singularity

If cc lies inside (a,b)(a,b) and the function is unbounded near cc, do not apply one antiderivative across the whole interval. Assuming no other improper points, define two separate quantities:

I−=lim⁡t→c−∫atf(x) dx,I+=lim⁡s→c+∫sbf(x) dx.\begin{aligned}I_-&=\lim_{t\to c^-}\int_a^t f(x)\,dx,\\I_+&=\lim_{s\to c^+}\int_s^b f(x)\,dx.\end{aligned}

Only when both limits are finite does ∫abf(x) dx=I−+I+\int_a^b f(x)\,dx=I_-+I_+. If either piece diverges, the original improper integral diverges. The cutoffs tt and ss are independent.

Worked example: cancellation does not repair divergence

Consider ∫−22dx/x\int_{-2}^2 dx/x. Its interior singularity is at 00. On the left,

∫−2tdxx=ln⁡∣t∣−ln⁡2.\int_{-2}^t\frac{dx}{x}=\ln|t|-\ln2.

This tends to −∞-\infty as t→0−t\to0^-. On the right,

∫s2dxx=ln⁡2−ln⁡s,\int_s^2\frac{dx}{x}=\ln2-\ln s,

which tends to +∞+\infty as s→0+s\to0^+. The improper integral diverges. The expression −∞+∞-\infty+\infty is not an allowable cancellation.

If we deliberately use equal positive cutoffs ε\varepsilon on both sides, a different calculation gives

∫−2−εdxx+∫ε2dxx=0.\begin{aligned}&\int_{-2}^{-\varepsilon}\frac{dx}{x}\\&\quad+\int_{\varepsilon}^2\frac{dx}{x}=0.\end{aligned}

The limit of this symmetric expression is called the Cauchy principal value. Here it is 00, but the ordinary improper integral still diverges. Odd symmetry cannot replace the separate convergence checks.

An interior singularity can still be integrable

For a contrasting example, consider ∫03∣x−1∣−1/2 dx\int_0^3|x-1|^{-1/2}\,dx. Split at 11. For t<1t<1, the left truncated integral is

∫0tdx1−x=2−21−t.\begin{aligned}&\int_0^t\frac{dx}{\sqrt{1-x}}\\&\quad=2-2\sqrt{1-t}.\end{aligned}

It tends to 22 as t→1−t\to1^-. For s>1s>1, the right truncated integral is

∫s3dxx−1=22−2s−1.\begin{aligned}&\int_s^3\frac{dx}{\sqrt{x-1}}\\&\quad=2\sqrt2-2\sqrt{s-1}.\end{aligned}

It tends to 222\sqrt2 as s→1+s\to1^+. Both limits are finite, so the integral converges to 2+222+2\sqrt2. The split is required even though the final answer is finite.

Two infinite bounds also need two checks

For ∫−∞∞f(x) dx\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}f(x)\,dx, choose a finite splitting point cc where the function is regular. If there are no finite singularities, test ∫−∞cf(x) dx\int_{-\infty}^c f(x)\,dx and ∫c∞f(x) dx\int_c^\infty f(x)\,dx separately. Both must converge. A single symmetric limit from −R-R to RR is not the defining test. Split at any finite singularities as well.

5. Why the two power tests differ

Power functions provide useful benchmarks. Let pp be real. For p≠1p\ne1,

∫1Rx−p dx=R1−p−11−p.\int_1^R x^{-p}\,dx=\frac{R^{1-p}-1}{1-p}.

As R→∞R\to\infty, the term R1−pR^{1-p} tends to zero precisely when p>1p>1. At p=1p=1, the logarithm diverges. Hence

∫1∞dxxp<∞⟺p>1.\begin{aligned}&\int_1^\infty\frac{dx}{x^p}<\infty\\&\quad\Longleftrightarrow p>1.\end{aligned}

In that convergent case, its value is 1/(p−1)1/(p-1). Near zero, the same antiderivative gives a different limit:

∫t1x−p dx=1−t1−p1−p.\int_t^1 x^{-p}\,dx=\frac{1-t^{1-p}}{1-p}.

Now t→0+t\to0^+, so t1−pt^{1-p} tends to zero when p<1p<1. Thus

∫01dxxp<∞⟺p<1.\begin{aligned}&\int_0^1\frac{dx}{x^p}<\infty\\&\quad\Longleftrightarrow p<1.\end{aligned}

Its value is then 1/(1−p)1/(1-p). At p=1p=1, this integral also diverges.

Keep the endpoint attached to the rule. At infinity, larger positive powers make the tail decay faster. Near zero, larger positive powers make the singularity stronger. Memorizing only “greater than one” loses the distinction.

In particular, ∫0∞x−p dx\int_0^\infty x^{-p}\,dx diverges for every real pp: convergence would require both p<1p<1 near zero and p>1p>1 at infinity. A function with different behaviour at the two ends can still converge at both.

6. Compare when an antiderivative is unhelpful

For continuous nonnegative functions on a tail [A,∞)[A,\infty), suppose 0≤f(x)≤g(x)0\le f(x)\le g(x). Then:

  • If ∫A∞g(x) dx\int_A^\infty g(x)\,dx converges, the smaller integral of ff converges.
  • If ∫A∞f(x) dx\int_A^\infty f(x)\,dx diverges, the larger integral of gg diverges.

You can also compare the functions as you approach a finite singularity from one side, provided they are continuous on every closed interval on that side that stays away from the singularity. Closed, bounded intervals where the functions are continuous do not affect convergence. Use these comparisons only where both functions are nonnegative.

Worked comparison: prove convergence without finding a value

For x≥1x\ge1, we have

0<1x2+3≤1x2.0<\frac{1}{x^2+3}\le\frac{1}{x^2}.

The integral of 1/x21/x^2 from 11 to infinity converges. Therefore ∫1∞dx/(x2+3)\int_1^\infty dx/(x^2+3) converges. Comparison establishes convergence and an upper bound; it does not say that the two integrals have the same value.

Choose the useful direction

To prove divergence of ∫1∞dx/x2+4\int_1^\infty dx/\sqrt{x^2+4}, find a divergent lower bound. Since x2+4≤5x2x^2+4\le5x^2 for x≥1x\ge1,

1x2+4≥15 x.\frac1{\sqrt{x^2+4}}\ge\frac1{\sqrt5\,x}.

The lower-bound integral diverges like ∫1∞dx/x\int_1^\infty dx/x, so the original integral diverges. Merely bounding a function above by a divergent one would be inconclusive.

7. Four progressive questions

For each question, identify the improper point before calculating. State the limiting expression or comparison, then give a finite value when available or a clear convergence conclusion. Try the question before opening its hint or solution.

1. Evaluate an exponential tail

Determine convergence and the exact value, if it exists, of ∫2∞5e−2x dx\int_2^\infty 5e^{-2x}\,dx.

Hint

Replace the upper bound by RR. An antiderivative is −52e−2x-\tfrac52 e^{-2x}.

Solution and reasoning

The only improper point is the infinite upper bound. For finite R>2R>2,

∫2R5e−2x dx=52(e−4−e−2R).\begin{aligned}&\int_2^R 5e^{-2x}\,dx\\&\quad=\frac52(e^{-4}-e^{-2R}).\end{aligned}

Since e−2R→0e^{-2R}\to0, the integral converges to 52e−4\tfrac52e^{-4}. The positive result agrees with a positive integrand.

2. Repair a calculation across a singularity

A student uses the antiderivative −1/(x−2)-1/(x-2) and concludes

∫04dx(x−2)2=−1.\int_0^4\frac{dx}{(x-2)^2}=-1.

Explain why the method fails and decide convergence.

Hint

Inspect the denominator inside the interval. A negative value is also a warning because the integrand is positive wherever it is defined.

Solution and reasoning

The singularity at x=2x=2 separates the interval into two pieces. The fundamental theorem cannot be applied across that point. On the left,

∫0tdx(x−2)2=−1t−2−12.\begin{aligned}&\int_0^t\frac{dx}{(x-2)^2}\\&\quad=-\frac1{t-2}-\frac12.\end{aligned}

As t→2−t\to2^-, this tends to +∞+\infty. On the right,

∫s4dx(x−2)2=−12+1s−2.\begin{aligned}&\int_s^4\frac{dx}{(x-2)^2}\\&\quad=-\frac12+\frac1{s-2}.\end{aligned}

This also tends to +∞+\infty as s→2+s\to2^+. The improper integral diverges. Either divergent side alone would already settle the question.

3. Use a comparison, not an exact value

Decide whether ∫3∞(2+cos⁡x)x−3/2 dx\int_3^\infty (2+\cos x)x^{-3/2}\,dx converges. An exact value is not required.

Hint

Use −1≤cos⁡x≤1-1\le\cos x\le1 to bound the whole numerator. Choose the power test at infinity.

Solution and reasoning

For x≥3x\ge3,

0≤2+cos⁡xx3/2≤3x3/2.0\le\frac{2+\cos x}{x^{3/2}}\le\frac3{x^{3/2}}.

The upper-bound integral converges because 3/2>13/2>1. Its value is

∫3∞3x−3/2 dx=23.\int_3^\infty 3x^{-3/2}\,dx=2\sqrt3.

The original integral therefore converges, with value between 00 and 232\sqrt3. The oscillation of the numerator causes no problem here because the entire nonnegative integrand is controlled by an integrable upper bound.

4. Find a parameter range at both ends

For which real values of pp does the following integral converge?

∫0∞dxxp(1+x).\int_0^\infty\frac{dx}{x^p(1+x)}.

Use comparisons; you do not need its exact value. For x>0x>0, interpret xpx^p as the usual positive real power.

Hint

Split at 11. On (0,1](0,1], the factor 1+x1+x lies between 11 and 22. On [1,∞)[1,\infty), it lies between xx and 2x2x.

Solution and reasoning

The integrand is positive and continuous for x>0x>0. Both zero and infinity need checking. For 0<x≤10<x\le1,

1xp(1+x)≥12xp,1xp(1+x)≤1xp.\begin{aligned}\frac1{x^p(1+x)}&\ge\frac1{2x^{p}},\\\frac1{x^p(1+x)}&\le\frac1{x^{p}}.\end{aligned}

The upper bound proves convergence near zero when p<1p<1. The lower bound proves divergence there when p≥1p\ge1. For x≥1x\ge1,

1xp(1+x)≥12xp+1,1xp(1+x)≤1xp+1.\begin{aligned}\frac1{x^p(1+x)}&\ge\frac1{2x^{p+1}},\\\frac1{x^p(1+x)}&\le\frac1{x^{p+1}}.\end{aligned}

At infinity, the upper bound proves convergence when p+1>1p+1>1, meaning p>0p>0. The lower bound proves divergence when p≤0p\le0. Both pieces converge exactly when

0<p<1.0<p<1.

The boundary values p=0p=0 and p=1p=1 are excluded: each produces a divergent logarithmic comparison at one end.

Your next check

  1. Mark every infinite bound and every point where the integrand becomes unbounded.
  2. Split so that each piece has one improper end. Give each cutoff its own one-sided limit.
  3. Evaluate the truncated integral, or justify a nonnegative comparison with the useful inequality direction.
  4. Conclude convergence only when every piece has a finite limit. Add the values only then.

For a next step, compare this limiting-area reasoning with the series-convergence questions. A series sums discrete terms; an improper integral takes a limit of accumulated integrals. Their convergence tests are related, but a justification still needs the conditions of the test being used.

Official course context

Course description: current Concordia undergraduate calendar.

Useful for

Work on the step you’re missing.

Tell us the subject and your preferred time. Nablio confirms the details by text or email.

Request a lesson