Dawson College · 201-SN2-RE

Dawson 201-SN2-RE: differential calculus tutoring

Work with an online tutor on limits, derivatives and applications in Dawson 201-SN2-RE. Start with a question that is blocking you or a basic concept you want to understand better. Your tutor can help you choose a first step, build the function for an application and explain the result. If you have an attempt, you can review it together.

Listed course

Course overview

Dawson 201-SN2-RE introduces differential calculus and prepares students to move from derivative applications to integral calculus.

Start here

Your 201-SN2-RE revision route

Choose only topics listed for your assessment. The course description supports this subject, but does not establish your section’s exam date or chapter cutoff.

  1. Choose topics. Early topics: limits and continuity
  2. Follow a worked example. Follow the product and chain rules
  3. Try without solutions. Try the existing course diagnostic before opening answers
  4. Get help with a step. Ask about 201-SN2-RE tutoring Include the chapter, assessment date and question; attempted work is useful but not required. Sessions are currently in English.

If your assessment includes applications: complete rational-function curve investigation. Otherwise, stay with the limits and derivative rules above.

Official course source Your section outline and instructor announcements take priority. These are Nablio study routes and exercises, not official exams.

Curve-analysis workshop: when the asymptote is a line

This original Dawson 201-SN2-RE practice extends the existing curve-sketching lesson with a slant asymptote and a derivative-graph transfer. It is a topic-based study option, not a prediction of your exam. Check your section’s outline before including curve applications or slant asymptotes in a timed review.

If your next assessment covers only early topics: work through domains and limits, then choosing derivative rules. Return here when your outline includes applications. For the earlier three-branch example, use domain breaks and derivative signs; this workshop does not replace that lesson or the printed-panel problem above.

A complete investigation

Investigate f(x)=x2/(x−1)f(x)=x^2/(x-1). Find its domain, intercepts, asymptotes, variation, extrema and concavity. Sketch separate branches and justify whether any inflection point exists. Try an initial sketch before reading the explanation.

Read the complete investigation

1. Record the domain and intercepts

The denominator excludes x=1x=1: D=R∖{1}D=\mathbb R\setminus\{1\}. The only zero of the numerator is x=0x=0, which is allowed, so the x- and y-intercepts coincide at (0,0)(0,0). Do not erase the excluded input when making sign tables.

2. Separate the polynomial part

Polynomial division gives f(x)=x+1+1x−1.f(x)=x+1+\frac1{x-1}. As x→1−x\to1^-, the last term tends to −∞-\infty; as x→1+x\to1^+, it tends to +∞+\infty. Thus x=1x=1 is a vertical asymptote. Since f(x)−(x+1)→0f(x)-(x+1)\to0 at both infinities, the slant asymptote is y=x+1y=x+1, not a horizontal line. The graph stays below this line for x<1x<1 and above it for x>1x>1, because the difference is 1/(x−1)1/(x-1). It never crosses the line in this example.

3. Use signs, not just stationary inputs

f′(x)=1−1(x−1)2=x(x−2)(x−1)2.f'(x)=1-\frac1{(x-1)^2}=\frac{x(x-2)}{(x-1)^2}. The denominator is positive wherever defined. Split at both zeros, 0 and 2, and at the excluded input 1.

  • x<0x<0: f′>0f'>0, increasing toward (0,0)(0,0).
  • 0<x<10<x<1: f′<0f'<0, decreasing toward −∞-\infty.
  • 1<x<21<x<2: f′<0f'<0, decreasing from +∞+\infty.
  • x>2x>2: f′>0f'>0, increasing away from (2,4)(2,4).

The sign change + to − proves a local maximum at (0,0)(0,0); − to + proves a local minimum at (2,4)(2,4). Neither is global on the full domain: values are unbounded above and below. Do not describe the curve as decreasing “from 0 to 2” without the break at 1.

4. Keep concavity separate from increasing/decreasing

f′′(x)=2(x−1)3.f''(x)=\frac2{(x-1)^3}. It is negative on (−∞,1)(-\infty,1), so the left branch is concave down; it is positive on (1,∞)(1,\infty), so the right branch is concave up. The change happens across a missing point, so there is no inflection point. A point of inflection must lie on the graph.

5. Assemble and check the sketch

Two branches of f equals x squared over x minus one, with vertical asymptote x equals one and slant asymptote y equals x plus one; local maximum at zero zero and local minimum at two four.
Schematic sketch; dashed lines are asymptotes, not parts of the curve.

Text equivalent: the left branch approaches the slant line from below as x tends to negative infinity, rises to (0,0), then falls to negative infinity at 1 from the left. The right branch starts at positive infinity at 1 from the right, falls to (2,4), then rises while approaching the slant line from above. The left branch is concave down throughout; the right is concave up throughout.

Check f(−1)=−1/2f(-1)=-1/2, f(1/2)=−1/2f(1/2)=-1/2, f(3)=9/2f(3)=9/2. Sample points help catch plotting errors, but the derivative signs justify the complete branch behaviour.

Three transfer problems

Keep the answers closed. For each conclusion, write the evidence: domain, a sign change, a limit or a slope on the derivative graph.

1. Build a fresh sign table

Let g(x)=(x+1)2/(x−2)g(x)=(x+1)^2/(x-2). Without graphing software, find the domain, slant asymptote and all increasing/decreasing intervals. Locate and classify the local extrema; explain whether they are global. You may use g′(x)=(x+1)(x−5)/(x−2)2g'(x)=(x+1)(x-5)/(x-2)^2, but verify it by rewriting g first.

Show a sign-table hint

Divide to obtain a line plus a remainder. Put −1, 2 and 5 in order; one is excluded rather than stationary.

Check the sign table

D=R∖{2}D=\mathbb R\setminus\{2\} and g(x)=x+4+9/(x−2)g(x)=x+4+9/(x-2), so the slant asymptote is y=x+4y=x+4. Differentiating gives 1−9/(x−2)2=(x+1)(x−5)/(x−2)21-9/(x-2)^2=(x+1)(x-5)/(x-2)^2.

The derivative signs are + on (−∞,−1)(-\infty,-1), − on (−1,2)(-1,2), − on (2,5)(2,5), and + on (5,∞)(5,\infty). Thus g increases on the first and fourth intervals and decreases on the second and third. There is a local maximum (−1,0)(-1,0) and a local minimum (5,12)(5,12). Neither is global, since g is unbounded below as x→2−x\to2^- and above as x→2+x\to2^+. The excluded input 2 is not an extremum.

2. Read the derivative’s graph, not the function’s height

A differentiable function F on (−3,5)(-3,5) has the continuous derivative shown below: straight segments join (−3,2)(-3,2), (1,−2)(1,-2), and (5,2)(5,2). In particular, the derivative crosses zero at −1 and 3. Given F(1)=2F(1)=2, find the increasing/decreasing intervals, local extrema by input, concavity intervals and inflection point. No integration is needed; the function value at 1 is supplied. Do not mistake a vertex of F′ for an extremum of F.

Graph of F prime: a line decreases from negative three two through negative one zero to one negative two, then increases through three zero to five two.
This graph is F′, not F. Endpoint dots are open because the stated domain is (−3,5).
Show a derivative-graph hint

F increases where F′ is above the axis. F is concave up where F′ increases. The supplied value F(1)=2 gives the height once you have justified the inflection input.

Check the derivative-graph reasoning

F increases on (−3,−1)(-3,-1) and (3,5)(3,5), and decreases on (−1,3)(-1,3). The derivative changes + to − at −1, giving a local maximum there; it changes − to + at 3, giving a local minimum there. F′ decreases on (−3,1)(-3,1) and increases on (1,5)(1,5), so F is concave down and then concave up. F is defined and continuous at 1, so it has an inflection point there even though F″ does not exist at that corner of F′.

Using the supplied value, the inflection point is (1,2)(1,2). It is not a local extremum: F′(1)=−2F'(1)=-2, and F is decreasing on both sides. The heights of the local extrema are not needed to classify them.

3. Diagnose an inflection-point claim

A student says: “If the second derivative is zero or changes sign at an input, that input is an inflection point.” Test the claim at 0 for p(x)=x4p(x)=x^4, q(x)=1/xq(x)=1/x, and r(x)=x3r(x)=x^3. State which graph, if any, has an inflection point there, and give a reason for each decision.

Show an inflection-point hint

Ask two separate questions: is there a point on the graph at the input, and does concavity change there? A zero second derivative is only a candidate test.

Check the three diagnoses

For p, p′′(x)=12x2p''(x)=12x^2: it is zero at 0 but positive on both sides. There is no concavity change and no inflection point. For q, q′′(x)=2/x3q''(x)=2/x^3 has opposite signs on the two sides, but q is not defined at 0, so there is no point of inflection there. For r, r′′(x)=6xr''(x)=6x changes from negative to positive, and r is continuous at 0. Thus (0,0)(0,0) is an inflection point of r. The derivative-graph problem above also shows that F″ need not exist at an actual inflection point.

Choose your next attempt: if an excluded input disappeared from your table, revisit domains and limits; if you confused increasing with concave up, repeat problem 2 with separate statements about F′ and F″. For tutoring, bring your section’s scope, your sketch and the first step you cannot justify. Keep using the course’s existing tutoring request rather than assuming an exam topic or a confirmed appointment.

201-SN2-RE topics to review

Limits and continuityDerivative rulesOptimizationCurve analysisAntiderivatives

Common difficulties

  • Turning a geometric constraint into a function of one variable with a valid domain
  • Justifying a maximum or minimum instead of stopping whenever a derivative equals zero

Differential calculus: check continuity and rule selection

Make a function continuous, then combine the product and chain rules. Explain each step before opening the solutions.

Before you start: Allow 20–25 minutes to try both questions, then 15 minutes to check and retry any missed steps.

1. Repair a discontinuity

For x≠3x\ne3, let f(x)=(x2−9)/(x−3)f(x)=(x^2-9)/(x-3), and set f(3)=kf(3)=k. Find the value of kk that makes ff continuous at 3. Then find f′(3)f^\prime(3) for that choice.

Show the explained solution
  1. Factor first: x2−9=(x−3)(x+3)x^2-9=(x-3)(x+3). Thus f(x)=x+3f(x)=x+3 only when x≠3x\ne3.
  2. The limit is lim⁡x→3f(x)=6\lim_{x\to3}f(x)=6. Continuity requires the defined value to match it, so k=6k=6.
  3. With that value, the completed function equals x+3x+3 for every real input. Therefore f′(3)=1f^\prime(3)=1. Cancelling alone did not define the missing value.

Limits and excluded inputs

2. Choose the outer rule first

Let g(x)=x2ln⁡(1+x)g(x)=x^2\ln(1+x), with x>−1x>-1. Find g′(x)g^\prime(x) and the exact value of g′(1)g^\prime(1).

Show the explained solution
  1. The outer operation is multiplication, so use the product rule. The logarithmic factor also needs the chain rule.
  2. g′(x)=2xln⁡(1+x)+x21+x.g^\prime(x)=2x\ln(1+x)+\frac{x^2}{1+x}.
  3. g′(1)=2ln⁡2+12.g^\prime(1)=2\ln2+\frac12. Keep x>−1x>-1: differentiating does not expand the original domain.

Derivative rules: diagnose the first step

Use your answers to plan your revision
  1. If the limit was wrong

    Factor without cancelling the condition on the input; write the limit and function value on separate lines.

  2. If a derivative term is missing

    Mark the two factors, name the first rule, then differentiate the inner logarithm. Redo the question without looking.

You can start 201-SN2-RE tutoring with either question above or a concept you want to understand better. Your tutor can explain the algebra, limit or derivative rule and help you begin. If you have an attempt or your current topic list, you can use it to choose what to work on next.

Request 201-SN2-RE exam preparation help

Original Nablio practice, not an official examination.

Course topic sources

Preparing for this course

Practise factoring, rational expressions, function domains and trigonometry before concentrating on derivative rules. Connect a secant slope to average change and a tangent slope to instantaneous change. When an optimization problem feels difficult, separate its algebraic model from the calculus used to solve it.

Registration requirements

The guidance above is study preparation, not an eligibility decision. Confirm current prerequisites, restrictions and availability with Dawson College.

Check the official course catalogue

Try a course problem

A rectangular printed panel must have area 96 cm296\,\mathrm{cm^2}. A surrounding border adds 2 cm2\,\mathrm{cm} on both the left and right and 3 cm3\,\mathrm{cm} at both the top and bottom. Find the printed width and height that minimize the area of the outside rectangle, including the border. Show that your dimensions give a global minimum: the smallest outside area among all allowed dimensions.

Show the reasoning

1. Define the dimensions and constraint. Let xx be printed width and yy printed height, measured in centimetres. Both are positive, and the fixed printed area gives xy=96xy=96, so y=96/xy=96/x for x>0x>0. The outside width is x+2+2=x+4x+2+2=x+4, and the outside height is y+3+3=y+6y+3+3=y+6. 2. Express the outside area using only the width. Let A(x)A(x) be outside area in square centimetres. Substituting the constraint gives A(x)=(x+4)(96/x+6)=96+6x+384/x+24=120+6x+384/xA(x)=(x+4)(96/x+6)=96+6x+384/x+24=120+6x+384/x. The constraint is imposed on the printed region, not on the outside rectangle. 3. Find the width where the area’s derivative is zero. A prime denotes differentiation with respect to xx. Then A′(x)=6−384/x2A'(x)=6-384/x^2. Setting this to zero gives 6x2=3846x^2=384, hence x2=64x^2=64. Only the positive solution x=8x=8 is admissible. Its printed height is y=96/8=12y=96/8=12. 4. Prove and check the minimum. For 0<x<80<x<8, 384/x2>6384/x^2>6, so A′(x)<0A'(x)<0; for x>8x>8, A′(x)>0A'(x)>0. Thus area decreases throughout the first interval and increases throughout the second, proving a global minimum at x=8x=8. The printed dimensions are 8 cm8\,\mathrm{cm} by 12 cm12\,\mathrm{cm}, whose product is 96 cm296\,\mathrm{cm^2}. The outside dimensions are 12 cm12\,\mathrm{cm} by 18 cm18\,\mathrm{cm}, giving 216 cm2216\,\mathrm{cm^2}. Each border occurs twice; counting it once changes the model.

Your turn: change the borders

Keep the printed area at 96 cm296\,\mathrm{cm^2}, but use borders of 3 cm3\,\mathrm{cm} on the left and right and 2 cm2\,\mathrm{cm} at the top and bottom. Let x>0x>0 be the printed width and y>0y>0 the printed height, both in centimetres. Before calculating, predict whether the previous printed width of 8 cm still minimizes the outside area. Rebuild the constraint and the outside-area function, then find the printed and outside dimensions and justify the global minimum. Keep the answer closed while you try. Start by labelling each border separately.

Check your reasoning
  1. 1. Rebuild the model

    The printed-area constraint remains xy=96xy=96, so y=96/xy=96/x for x>0x>0. The outside dimensions are now x+6x+6 and y+4y+4. With A(x)A(x) denoting outside area in square centimetres,

    A(x)=120+4x+576x.A(x)=120+4x+\frac{576}{x}.

    This comes from (x+6)(96/x+4)(x+6)(96/x+4). The changed borders belong in the outside dimensions; they do not change the printed-area constraint.

  2. 2. Find and justify the minimum

    A prime means differentiation with respect to xx. Thus A′(x)=4−576/x2A^\prime(x)=4-576/x^2. The positive root is x=12x=12. The derivative is negative for 0<x<120<x<12 and positive for x>12x>12, proving a global minimum over the entire physical domain. Then y=96/12=8y=96/12=8.

  3. 3. Check the dimensions

    The printed region is 12 cm12\,\mathrm{cm} wide and 8 cm8\,\mathrm{cm} high; the outside rectangle is 18 cm18\,\mathrm{cm} by 12 cm12\,\mathrm{cm}. Its area is 216 cm2216\,\mathrm{cm^2}. Keeping the old printed width of 8 cm would instead give (8+6)(12+4)=224 cm2(8+6)(12+4)=224\,\mathrm{cm^2}. The minimum area happens to equal the original minimum, but its width and height have exchanged roles. Reusing the old dimensions would miss that change.

How tutoring can help

Your tutor can help you choose a first step for a limit or derivative, or examine a calculation you have started to find where a rule or algebra step went wrong. For optimization, they can help you turn the constraint into a function of one variable, check its domain and explain why the chosen dimensions give a maximum or minimum.

Exam preparation for 201-SN2-RE

Use your section’s outline to choose limit, derivative and application questions for the next exam. Include continuity, curve analysis and basic antiderivatives when assigned. In optimization, state the function’s domain, check relevant endpoints and use derivative signs to justify a maximum or minimum. Explain the final result in terms of the original problem.

We work through permitted practice and comparable problems, without completing graded assignments or exams on your behalf.

Need help with 201-SN2-RE?

Send your topic and preferred times. We’ll confirm whether we can help and, if so, agree on a time by text or email before payment.

Request 201-SN2-RE tutoring

Nablio is an independent service and is not affiliated with this institution.

201-SN2-RE · official course reference201-SN2-RE · official offering information